![renderman vs mental ray renderman vs mental ray](https://sdm.scad.edu/faculty/mkesson/vsfx502/wip/best/fall11/rachel_start/comparative_rendering/new2_mr_occ_zoom_4m55s.jpg)
![renderman vs mental ray renderman vs mental ray](https://www.runharry.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/lastmile_video2_05-1024x576.png)
I think 3Delight comes close in this regard and with what little I’ve played with Gelato, it seems to be headed towards that same fidelity. The best I can describe it is as a soft, pleasing, non-computer generated look. Throwing all the features and specs out the window, from an artistic standpoint, I find there is a certain image fidelity that Pixar’s Renderman generates with even the simplest lighting setups that no other renderer on the market seems to be able to match. If I had to pick for a animated feature, I’d think I’d go with PRMan after beating my head against MR for motion blur. I see these up and coming renders as something to fill a niche job, such as rendering background plates with lots of things going on, but I would not feel comfortable using it as my main solution. So depending on the size of the project and the staff, you might also want to consider which is easier to hire for. I’m not putting any other rendering solutions down, but so far, Renderman and Mental Ray are the only solutions that I know of that are tried and true in production, and on a large scale. This isn’t to say that both can’t do a good job of what the other one does easily, but it’s definately worth noting and saving a few hairs on your head to find out. If you’re having to accurately simulate phenomena like caustics and GI, then go with Mental Ray. I’m being overly general when I say that if you want good motion blur, for animation, effects, whatever, go with the renderman specs. One of the big hurdles I’ve had experience with when it comes to rendering for animation is dealing with motion blur.
Renderman vs mental ray free#
I may be wrong on some of the finer details of this, so anyone feel free to correct me. If you’re doing anything other than stills, don’t even try it. Such things are possible with MR, but they’re a bit more difficult.
![renderman vs mental ray renderman vs mental ray](https://www.iamag.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Animation-vs.-Minecraft-1-1024x640.jpg)
Stuff like Delayed Readarchives, trace sets, and whatnot. Motion blur, PRMan kicks MR’s butt seven ways from Sunday.Īlso, because the RISpec is, to my mind, more flexible as to when you declare certain stuff, you can do a lot of tricks with PRMan easier than you would with MR. GI and FG, depending on your implementation, MR is faster, but blotchier and more artifacted. This causes major differences in how they handle certain calculations. The main difference between the two is that MR is a raytracing-based engine, while PRMan is a REYES engine. There are multiple Renderman-compliant renderers out there, including Photorealistic Renderman (PRMan), often called “Renderman.” I am assuming you’re talking about PRMan, so I’ll talk about that. First off, Renderman is a specification of shading description and implementation, not a renderer itself.